The appellant sought to challenge Bandung Religious Court Decision No. 2 of 2014, dated 25 November 2015, pursuant to art 7(1) of Law No. 20 of 1947 on Judicial Revision. The court, however, agreed with the lower court that the appellant's claim failed due to formulaic errors in his application. Specifically, the appellant had submitted in his application that the conduct of the respondent was illegal, and that the auctioning of the property in question was also illegal. In the outline of the appellant's claim, however, the appellant had failed to clearly, and in sufficient detail, explain why the auction was illegal.