The parties were married on 26 January 2004, the plaintiff at the time being a new bride, the defendant a divorcee. They had one child. The plaintiff told the court that the parties' marriage had been harmonious up until a year ago, when they had started to quarrel regularly over financial matters. More specifically, the plaintiff alleged that the defendant never provided her with shopping money to shop for daily necessities, and that the defendant no longer showed any care for the plaintiff. When problems escalated between the parties, the defendant finally left the matrimonial home to live with his parents, where he had remained for the past year. During that time the parties had not been physically intimate with one another. The plaintiff submitted that the defendant's attitude and behaviour had caused her extended suffering, that she had endeavoured to rectify the situation with the defendant, but that she now felt divorce to be the only feasible option available.
The court conceded that the purpose of marriage, as envisaged in Surat Ar-Rum verse 21, art 1 of Law No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage, and art 3 of the Compilation of Islamic Laws, being a peaceful, hopeful and loving (sakinah, mawaddah dan rahmah) household, was no longer feasible. Accordingly, pursuant to art 39(2) of Law No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage, art 19(f) of Government Regulation No. 9 of 1975, art 116(f) of the Compilation of Islamic Laws, and Kitab Fiqih Sunnah Juz II, the court granted the applicant an irrevocable divorce (talak satu ba'in sughra) on the grounds of ongoing conflict. The court also cited Kitab Al-Anwar Juz II in support of its granting a divorce in the absence of the defendant, who had failed to attend court, despite having been formally summonsed.